Monday, May 7, 2012

Bruce Gagnon on weapons and nukes in space, Jeju Island, and the corporatization of the US military

Bruce Gagnon, co-founder and coordinator of the Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space, recently toured the northwest, where he spoke to David Delk, AfD co-chair and host of the Portland OR chapter's show Populist Dialogues.

Bruce and David talked about the US military industrial complex, which now serves as a "resource extraction service" for global corporatism. The need to control gas and oil resources--including access to oil by China--is driving US military expansion in Asia, while space technologies developed by taxpayer dollars are now being seen as a means for private corporations to generate wealth by mining planets and asteroids.

You can watch Bruce's wide-ranging, fascinating, and frightening report here, and learn how to rebroadcast this show on your local public access station here. If your station would prefer receiving shows on dvd, please email the Alliance for Democracy office.

  In addition to hosting Bruce on Populist Dialogues, Alliance for Democracy joined several organizations in sponsoring Bruce and South Korean artist and peace activist Gillchun Koh at a demonstration at the Seattle South Korean Consulate.

The protest targeted the naval base currently under construction on Jeju Island, South Korea. This naval base is unnecessary, a drain on our economy, will destabilize both US and South Korean relations with China, and will put the people of Jeju Island at risk as a strategic target. We're posting a short history of the resistance to the base construction and commentary containing some good reasons for bringing this project to a halt. We've excerpted them from writing by Leonard Eiger, coordinator of Puget Sound Nuclear Weapon Free Zone


 The April 3 Massacre
30,000 people murdered!!! Jeju Island is known as the "Island of World Peace," a name that does not begin to tell the story of the Island's extensive history of conflict, occupation, repression and genocide. The most horrific episode in this history began in 1948 when the South Korean military and national police hunted down and slaughtered approximately 30,000 people. The U.S., which was the occupying power at the time, did nothing to stop what is now known as the April 3 massacre.

Why did the government do such a horrific thing? 1948 was a tumultuous time of establishing two governments in Korea. The people of Jeju Island rose up to protest the long-term division of the nation by boycotting the elections that were occurring in Seoul. For this they were branded as Communists, and the terror began.

For decades following, public discussion of the April 3 massacre was ruthlessly repressed. Following democratization, the slow and painful process of fact finding and truth telling began, and continues today. In 2003, South Korean President Noh Moo Hyun travelled to Jeju Island and officially apologized.

History Repeats Itself 
Now, over 60 years after the April 3 massacre the people of Jeju Island are once again protesting. This time they are protesting the U.S. Missile Defense System and a provocative new naval base being built on their island.

Why? If you look at a map of Jeju Island, you can see that it lies about 500 kilometers West of China. This military base is intended to project force towards China and to provide a forward operating installation in the event of a military conflict between the U.S. and China. For five years, South Korean activists have been protesting the plans for the new naval base on Jeju Island. During that time the response by the South Korean police and military has become more heavy-handed and brutal. Col. Anne Wright (former United States Army colonel and retired official of the U.S. State Department) reported that earlier this month "police broke arms of activists who had locked arms inside PCV pipes, beat up activists and threw them from kayaks."

A Global Context
(Excerpt from article by Noam Chomsky and Matthew Hoey)
The last thing the world needs is a military confrontation between the U.S. and China. On that dreaded eventuality, there is no need to elaborate. In terms of its implications, what is now taking place on Jeju island counts as one of the most critical struggles against a potentially devastating war in Asia, and the deeply-rooted institutional structures that are driving the world towards even more bitter conflict than is raging in all too many places today.

It is important to become aware of what is happening on Jeju Island and to find ways to help the residents to prevent this very dangerous and destructive project. The consequences of losing the struggle to prevent the base construction might impact not only Asia but the United States and the rest of the world as well. The project is naturally seen by China as a threat to its national security. At the very least, it is likely to trigger confrontation and an arms race between South Korea and China, with the U.S. almost inevitably drawn in.

The immediate threat is to Jeju Island civilians, whose home was recently described in a South Korean daily as “the spearhead of the country’s defense line,” a line recklessly located approximately 500km from China. We need not speculate about how the U.S. would react were China doing something similar near its coast.

For more information:
Save Jeju Island website
Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space

Read more...

Monday, April 30, 2012

Self-governance and rights-based organizing will be the focus of a talk in Burlington, WA

AfD water activist Sanda Spargo forwarded this notice of an upcoming event in Washington state:

If you're tired of the constant battle for a voice in governance, come hear a new and unified approach. On May 4, Kai Huschke of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund will speak at the Burlington, WA public library, 820 E. Washington Avenue. Kai will be discussing Democracy School and a Community Bill of Rights. Democracy School teaches the right to local, self-government that enables communities to reject unsustainable economic and environmental policies set by government and enables legal framework that charters sustainable energy production, sustainable land development and sustainable water, among others. A Community Bill of Rights tailors rights-based local laws according to a community's needs.

For more information, call 360-293-8128 or see CELDF's website.

Locally, volunteers Naomi Bunis, an artist, and Stoney Bird, an environmental attorney, are members of Living Democracy/Bellingham, and are helping Skagit County and Anacortes to form Living Democracy groups with an eye to establishing a chain of these groups along Highway 5 and the railway corridor. Naomi and Stoney are collaborating with CELDF, whose legal work is free to the public.

Read more...

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Multiple countries are rejecting investor state dispute settlement clauses in free trade agreements

by Janet Eaton

There appears to be a growing awareness that NAFTA-style foreign investor privileges and their private "investor-state dispute system [ISD]", which have been among the most controversial aspects of past US trade deals, should be rejected in trade and investment agreements. (ISDs allow corporations to sue to overturn local or national regulations or laws that are perceived as impinging in any way on the "right" of the corporation to profit. Past suits have targeted environmental and health regulations.)

In particular this provision has emerged as a point of major contention in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations, with Julia Gillard's Australian government announcing last April that they would reject investor-state arbitration in all trade agreements. It seems that her government was not only concerned about the loss of public policy sovereignty but was also taking seriously the advice of the  Australian Productivity Commission which concluded there were "few clear benefits, and several worrying risks, associated with such provisions."

Following on the heels of Australia, Korea appeared poised to go the same route with polls showing the opposition, which rejected ISD, favoured to win the upcoming election; however, in the election held last week, the governing Conservatives managed to hold on to a slender majority so the jury is still out as regards South Korea. However one clue might be found in a recent April 6th claim by India that it plans to abolish the investor-state dispute system and renegotiate FTAs with South Korea, Singapore, and other countries. According to the English language newspaper, Indian Express,  New Delhi´s decision to abandon the ISD system is based on its first-hand experience with the potential threat foreign companies pose to public policy on the grounds of investment agreement violations.

Other countries that have concerns with, are opposed to, or have rejected, ISD, include the South African government which is re-examining the ISD system after a policy of affirmative action for blacks, aimed at reducing economic disparities between white and black people, was targeted in 2007 by a multinational corporation; the Brazilian parliament which has refused to ratify a number of investment agreements on the grounds that they infringe on legislative sovereignty and Ecuador and Bolivia that have pulled out of the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes convention.

Meanwhile in the US and Canada, both President Obama and Prime Minister Harper are pushing Investor State Dispute settlement in their frenzy to initiate  free trade deals in every corner of the world. In the case of Obama this is in spite of his presidential campaign promises to review NAFTA Ch 11 [investor state] and other harmful aspects of free trade agreements in general and in spite of over 100 members of Congress and many progressive NGOs expressing support for the TRADE [Trade Reform, Accountability, Development and Employment] Act introduced by Representative Michael Michaud [D-Maine] and Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio).

In the case of Mr. Harper, he ignores calls from civil society, NGOs, institutes, activists and three opposition parties to renegotiate NAFTA Ch 11 while belittling anyone who tries to make the case. . [6]

Hopefully this momentum to reject the ISD system will eventually be powerful enough to influence the Harper government because in the words of a statement of concern initiatied by Canadian academics with expertise relating to investment law, arbitration, and regulation:

"We have a shared concern for the harm done to the public welfare by the international investment regime, as currently structured, especially its hampering of the ability of governments to act for their people in response to the concerns of human development and environmental sustainability."

Photo: Foreign Policy In Focus

Read more...

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

"Corporate Personhood Has Got to Go"

The Citizens United decision didn't come out of thin air. This video is a terrific look at the history of corporate personhood and political bribery and how the expanding nature of "we the people" has been countered by an equally lengthy history of a US ruling class obtaining more rights and powers for corporations.

The good news is that from the national level, with the Move to Amend coalition, Free Speech for People, and other groups working on constitutional amendments to eliminate corporate access to constitutional personhood rights, to the local level with towns passing rights-based ordinances to protect local economies and ecosystems, "we the (real) people" are developing more ways to take back our government from corporate rule.

Read more...

Monday, April 2, 2012

Upcoming Defending Water in Maine events

Stop by one of these events. Learn about threats to Maine's water and wilderness and get involved with building community rights to protect resources and sustainability. For more information, see the Defending Water for Maine website.

Thursday, April 5, 6:00 to 8:30 p.m.
"Tapped" Film Showing and Discussion
New Forest Institute, 66 Monroe Highway, Brooks, Maine 04921
(207) 722-3625

Saturday, April 14-Monday, April 16
Youth Activist Gathering. Workshop on Rights-Based Ordinances
729 Lakeview Drive, South China, Maine 04358
Learn more at maineyag.wordpress.com

Saturday, April 21, 11 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Tabling at HOPE Festival, also possible presentation on East-West Corridor
Student Recreation and Fitness Center
University of Maine in Orono, Orono, Maine
For more information, www.peacectr.org

Friday, April 28, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Tabling at Waterville Earth Day Celebration
Barrels Community Market, downtown Waterville, Maine

Read more...

A step forward for the California DISCLOSE Act

AB 1648, the California DISCLOSE Act, which will help voters know who or what is paying for political ads, passed the Assembly Elections and Redistricting Committee late last week on a 4-2 vote, thanks to the support of many citizens and advocacy groups. Next step is a hearing before the Assembly Appropriations Committee on April 18th. Lobbyists representing some of the largest special interests in the state are trying to keep voters in the dark by killing the bill. Info at www.caclean.org.

Read more...

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

AfD organizer to speak on participatory budgeting, development, racial inequality, and public banks

Ruth Caplan, AfD vice co-chair and head of our Defending Water for Life campaign, will be part of a panel discussion on participatory budgeting, racial inequality and local development this month in New York, as part of an international conference on participatory budgeting in the US and Canada.

She'll be joining panelists Mike Menser of the Participatory Budgeting Project and Brooklyn College, Jessica Gordon Nembhard of John Jay College, and Kenneth Edusei of Brooklyn College.

The panelists will focus on coop history in the urban black US, and potential for participatory budgeting in Flatbush, and connections with public banking in the US as a route to more sustainable communities. We hope there's video--we'll try to get it and post it after the event. For more info on the conference, check out the website, here.

Read more...

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Taking a stand against state-supported vote suppression

Former Marine Tim Thompson, in his first protest ever, refused to show a picture ID in order to vote in Tennessee's Super Tuesday primary. Even though he had the proper legal identification, he gave up his right to vote as a protest on behalf of the potentially millions of low-income, older, and college-age citizens who may lose their right to vote because of the new restrictive ID laws being enacted across the country. "Uncounted" filmmaker David Earnhardt, Thompson's brother-in-law, captured dramatic footage of Thompson's protest on his cell phone, and chronicled his journey on Super Tuesday in this short film, as Thompson's protest developed into a national story.

Read more...